Chuyển đến nội dung chính

What Made Marvel Different?

Over at Timely-Atlas Yahoo Groups there has been an ongoing discussion on whether Stan Lee was aware of his competition at DC, how closely he copied their characters and how it affected Marvel's line-up. Of course Stan was aware of the competition, as was Publisher Martin Goodman, but no matter how influenced they were, in the final analysis it is the differences - not the similarities - that made Marvel stand out.   

Marvel in the 1960's was completely different from DC (and their other competitors) in so many ways. Their covers used darker tones; more grays, purples and gradations, courtesy of colorist Stan Goldberg. Stan Lee's cover copy was flamboyant and melodramatic, but he added self-referential touches and humor that connected with his audiences ("If you don't like this comic, you might enjoy Millie the Model").

 



Journey into Mystery # 106, July 1964. Jack Kirby pencils, Chis Stone inks, Sam Rosen letters and Stan Goldberg coloring.

Lee's playful cover copy set the tone for Marvel's distinct personality. 



Strange Tales # 122 July 1964 Kirby pencils; Sol Brodsky inks (and likely alterations); Ditko Dr. Strange vignette. Lee copy.




The art was rougher and less polished than the clean-cut look exemplified by Curt Swan and Carmine Infantino at DC. Their style had a suburban feel; the streets were immaculate; houses and lawns perfect. Even their villains looked dapper and less threatening. Kirby and Ditko's world was distinctly urban. Marvel's heroes fought in the streets, rooftops and alleyways of New York, where garbage pails, fire hydrants and tenements existed and water towers loomed high above. An apt comparison would be to movie studios of the 1930s and 1940s. DC echoed the elegance of MGM; Marvel the rough and tumble features of Warner Brothers. 


The FF creep through the grungy side streets of New York (Yancy Street was a recurring gag in the series; The Thing had grown up on the block and the "Yancy Street Gang" were his unseen foils) Jack Kirby depicted these scenes from first hand experience, having grown up on the Lower East Side. Dick Ayers thick brush strokes perfectly accompanied Kirby's pencils. Fantastic Four # 20, November 1963.



Speaking of Warner Brothers, William Wellman could have directed a scene like this! Mobsters, cops and piers as Ditko brings aspects of crime thrillers with impeccable skill. Amazing Spider-Man # 27, August 1965.  


The Flash races through squeaky clean, picture-perfect streets; a jarring contrast to Kirby and Ditko's age-old buildings and cracked pavements. Carmine Infantino pencils, Joe Giella inks, Flash # 130 August 1962.


Marvel's characters looked nothing like the clean-shaven heroes that populated DC, Dell or Archie; the Thing, the Hulk, Spider-Man, Thor, Sgt. Fury were a ragtag bunch: faces concealed, long haired, a pair of monsters, some in ripped shirts and pants - hardly a conservative looking group. What Stan, Jack and Steve did was take surface elements of the traditional superhero and refashion them, creating a harder-edged product.

Growing up in the 1960's I had the opportunity, thanks to my older brother John, to read comics from a variety of companies:DC, Gold Key, Tower, Archie, Charlton - I never confused one product with another (even Archie's Mighty Comics line, which tried very hard to mimic - some would say outright confiscate - Marvel's look, didn't fool me at 6 years old). We did read more Marvel's product on a steady basis, attracted by the ongoing stories, sharp writing and superb storytelling. Lee, Kirby and Ditko were the core group, but Wood, Romita, Colan, Buscema, Heck, Ayers and an array of others contributed to a special moment in the world of comics. They were different not because Martin Goodman followed competitors sales figures and asked for similar titles (something he did throughout his life as publisher), but due to the creativity and individuality of the creators working for him. Without them, Marvel's line would likely be a footnote in comics, recognized only by the few interested in such minutiae.                 


Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

More Kirby War: Battle

For my 50th post (I never thought I'd make it this far!) I will examine the 10 stories Jack Kirby produced for Battle , an Atlas comic that originated in 1951 and ceased publication in 1960.   In 1959, concurrent with his output on monster, western and romance stories, Kirby was assigned a number of compelling war stories. Based on a thorough reading it appears that Kirby scripted as well as drew many of the pre-1960 stories (an examination of possible scripts in other genre stories will appear at a later date). There are many similarities in style, tone, emphasis of words, phrases, use of quotation marks and sound effects that point to Kirby’s input. I will focus on these patterns as I go through each story.     "Action on Quemoy!" Battle # 64, June 1959, Jack Kirby story ? Kirby pencils; Christopher Rule inks, Job # T-266. The opening narration is similar to the style Kirby often employed; a long paragraph of exposition (which would be seen...

The Good Guys

Over the years I've been blessed to meet many of the creators whose work I admire and respect. With some its been a chat at conventions, others I've gotten to spend time with, such as Joe Sinnott and Dick Ayers, still others email or correspondence by post. Of the old guard, to a person they have been generous, gracious and often humble. From Stan Lee to Steve Ditko, it has been an absolute pleasure to encounter such talented and unique creators.  One of the great moments was meeting Jack Kirby. I first saw him at the 1975 Marvel Convention, when he was introduced as a surprise guest, returning to Marvel. As he walked to the podium there was a tremendous ovation from the audience. From time to time I saw Kirby at other conventions over the years, but my last encounter was a special one. It was at a New York Con, where I had taken my little brother, Terry. I was a volunteer Big Brother for many years, and Terry gr...

Just a short note:

Kid's Stuff RETURNS! That's right! Starting on Monday, The Crapbox begins its annual march to Christmas with twice a week (maybe more?) reviews of comics aimed squarely at the younger set. We'll put the FORGOTTEN HEROES back in the Crapbox, but something tells me they won't be in there for long. Too many good ones got away without a review for me to not revisit that stack sometime early 2019.  However, there will be a slight change to Kid's Stuff this year. In the past I've focused Kid's Stuff on toy tie-ins, but this year I thought I'd do something a little different. While there are still MOUNDS of toys and video game comics floating around in the Crapbox, I thought we could tackle a different set of books. As a change of pace, so to speak. That's why this year I'll be digging out comics that were spinoffs of new or old kid's cartoons. I'm dubbing this year's run up to Christmas " Kid's Stuff: Saturday Morning Cartoon Ed...